Skinome's skin care obviously without PFAS - but why do other people use them?
smink med “PFAS” – visar Skinomes ställning mot hälsofarliga ämnen
In Skinome's products you will of course not find PFAS, we have never used these hazardous substances as the risks have been known for a long time. The question, however, is why they are still in so many products on the market? We think it is positive that these questions are now starting to be asked more and more often and no one has probably missed the recent media scrutiny of PFAS. Most recently in a series of articles in Aftonbladet where they write about a study where researchers examined the cosmetics industry and found the substance in a number of popular products when testing 43 common beauty products sold in Sweden. The question is, how can companies with the knowledge we have today, continue to use it in their products?
What are PFAS?

PFAS are a large group of highly fluorinated, synthetically produced substances that are very difficult to degrade and therefore long-lived in the environment. PFAS are therefore sometimes called eternal chemicals and these are found in a number of products and have become the subject of intense debate in Sweden. Among other things, after contaminating drinking water via fire protection foam in Blekinge, but also after recently discovered contaminants in the fishing waters in Boden. And most recently in the review of the cosmetics industry that Aftonbladet highlighted.

Why are PFAS used?

PFAS are primarily used for their water-repellent properties, in products such as fire-fighting foam, water-repellent clothing and frying pans. Unfortunately, PFAS are also used in cosmetic products to make them last longer and improve their water resistance. They can be found in waterproof mascara and foundation, but also in a range of other products such as face creams, face masks, eyeliners, hair oil, shaving foam, powders, serums and eyeshadows. But the benefits come with a hidden cost.

Endocrine disrupting and carcinogenic effects

PFAS can disrupt the body's hormone system, which can lead to various health problems. Exposure to PFAS has been shown to affect thyroid function, our reproduction and increase the risk of certain cancers. These effects can occur even at low levels of exposure, which is common with daily use of cosmetics.

Environmental impact

The environmental impact of PFAS is equally serious. These long-lasting chemicals do not break down naturally and therefore accumulate in water, soil and living organisms. This accumulation can have widespread effects on ecosystems and affect human health through contaminated water and food for a very long time.

In December 2023, the municipal water company in Ronneby was finally ordered by the Supreme Court, after a long legal process, to pay damages to victims who had ingested PFAS via the drinking water in the municipality. A relevant question is what responsibility do the companies that currently and previously used PFAS in their products have, despite the knowledge that these substances are hazardous to health?

Knew already in the 60s...

As early as the 1960s, animal studies conducted by 3M and DuPont showed that PFAS chemicals posed health risks. By the mid-1970s, 3M knew that PFAS were accumulating in the blood of Americans. In the 1980s, both 3M and DuPont linked PFAS to cancer and found elevated cancer rates among their own workers.

…but only now has the decision been made to “phase out” PFAS in cosmetics

Now, the European industry body Cosmetics Europe (CE), and also the Swedish KoHF (Cosmetics and Hygiene Companies' Industry Association), have recommended that manufacturers of cosmetic products should phase out and not market cosmetic products that contain intentionally added PFAS by December 31, 2025 at the latest (1).

But they are still present in many products. In the review that Aftonbladet did in November 2023, it is written that the most products with PFAS in the list of ingredients were found by the researchers in products from the French L'Oréal group. In an email response to the newspaper, they state that they stopped using PFAS in 2020, but despite this, there are still many products on sale where PFAS substances are listed among the ingredients.

The company also states that it is difficult to say how long these products will remain on the market for sale. This is another aspect and downside of the traditional skincare industry that we want to highlight where large volumes can be produced as the shelf life of the products is often several years. Read the article in Aftonbladet here.

Skinome_Var_guide_till_probiotika_2.jpg
Skinoma
We obviously do not use PFAS and never have.

How can substances that were already seen to cause negative health effects in humans in the 1960s still be legal to use? These are questions that we grapple with. We even have customers who contact us and ask if we have PFAS in our products. No, is the simple answer, we would never use these substances in our formulations.

The big question is, how can we, with the knowledge we have today, wait until the end of 2025 to regulate the use of PFAS and continue to use it in our products?

This feels not only outdated, but downright irresponsible. What do you think?